[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [solved] Re: Message at boot: `A start job is running for LSB: Raise network interfaces'



Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> writes:

> Am 2015-07-07 14:19, schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
>>> You have an interface configured to use WPA and DHCP. This *WILL* take a
>>> few seconds. First, your adapter needs to find the Access Point,
>>> establish a connection and authenticate using the pre-shared key. Only
>>> once that link is established, can the DHCP sequence begin. This
>>> involves broadcasting a request packet and then listening for several
>>> seconds (this is repeated at varying intervals). Once an acceptable
>>> acknowledgement packet is received, then hook scripts are run to set IP,
>>> DNS, NTP etc. Only once they are done, can the interface be considered
>>> "ready".
>>
>> I see.  But on another machine of mine, I have the same configuration and
>> the problem doesn't occur.
>
> Well, it depends on how long the interface setup takes: some
> hardware and driver combinations just might take a bit longer than
> others to set everything up.
>
> systemd has a built-in timeout that if it has to wait longer than
> X seconds (X being 10 or 15 or so) for a job to complete, it will
> display some information so that the user has an idea of what's
> going on with their system (default job timeout before systemd
> considers a job failed is 90s, and many people might think their
> system to already have crashed, were they forced to wait that long
> before seeing any output).

I see.

> Note that since you now use allow-hotplug, be aware that you should
> be careful with that: if you have ANY boot service that requires an
> active network interface, they won't work anymore, even if the setup
> of the interface is fast, since systemd will then not order anything
> relative to network availability anymore. So if you have NFS
> filesystems or similar: don't use allow-hotplug, always use auto!
>
> Christian

It shouldn't be my case.  Anyway, thanks for your warning for the future.

Rodolfo


Reply to: