[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libvirt, dnsmasq, and resolvconf



Laine Stump provided this useful info on the libvirt-users list:

This commit (which was included in libvirt 1.2.12) may help you to a
solution:


commit 298fa4858ced29e2c42681635a5a8dcd6da0b231
Author: Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 3 16:01:33 2014 -0800

    network: Let domains be restricted to local DNS

    This adds a new "localOnly" attribute on the domain element of the
    network xml.  With this set to "yes", DNS requests under that domain
    will only be resolved by libvirt's dnsmasq, never forwarded upstream.

    This was how it worked before commit f69a6b987d616, and I found that
    functionality useful.  For example, I have my host's NetworkManager
    dnsmasq configured to forward that domain to libvirt's dnsmasq, so I can
    easily resolve guest names from outside.  But if libvirt's dnsmasq
    doesn't know a name and forwards it to the host, I'd get an endless
    forwarding loop.  Now I can set localOnly="yes" to prevent the loop.

So it sounds like the proper thing to do is to set the localOnly
attribute and put the libvirt network in a subdomain, then point the
dnsmasq on the host to the libvirt dns for that subdomain.

[Comment by Ross: It seems this addresses my concern about a loop
between different copies of dnsmasq, at least if used with judicious
domain assignment.
Unfortunately, libvirt >= 1.2.12 is only available in stretch/testing,
which is currently at 1.2.16.]

Ross


Reply to: