Re: (should be) simple bind problem
On May 25, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> wrote:
> Glenn English wrote:
>> root@srv:~# ps -ef | grep named
>> bind 2098 1 0 May10 ? 00:00:36 /usr/sbin/named -u bind
>> root 10498 1 0 May10 ? 00:00:50 /usr/sbin/named -c /etc/bind/named.conf
>
> There are two of them running? That doesn't seem right. The first
> one looks okay but the second one does not.
>
> I would be inclined to kill both of them. Then start it up again and
> check all over again.
Just tried that. They were still 2 of them there. I stopped Bind9 with the init.d script, but the second (root) was still there. So I killed it and started Bind again (init script doesn't 'killall named' I guess??). Now it looks right.
FWIW, the one started by root was dated yesterday. I started today's Bind a few minutes ago, and root hasn't started another one yet.
I'll look through the logs and look at the rest of your message later.
--
Glenn English
Reply to: