also sprach martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> [2015-04-20 15:32 +0200]: > g+s on the directory (as well as the Samba "force directory mode" > setting) do not affect existing files moved into the tree, which is > what happens most of the time actually. ACLs also don't work, since > they are ultimately governed by the group bits, which get > interpreted as mask. Forgot to mention umask too, which is no good. First, it also only applies to new files; And second, it would only work if every user would ensure the setting was locally active. And if you've ever tried to implement e.g. a git-hook-based quality assurance policy, you'll know that expecting all your users to ensure policy compliance just doesn't work reliably. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "if english was good enough for jesus christ, it's good enough for us." -- miriam ferguson, governor of texas
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)