[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian 8



On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Petter Adsen wrote:
> > Oh I see. Consider this link then:
> > 
> > https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html
> > 
> > Especially chapter 2.2.2, which talks about GNOME 3.14.
> > 
> > Funny thing is - chapter 2.2.2 does not mention GNOME Classic at all.
> > Presumably because GNOME Classic was axed in GNOME 3.6 (or 3.8, or
> > 3.10
> > - the memory fails me here).
> 
> I see. I found another link[1], but that only mentions that Gnome in
> Jessie requires 3D drivers, which I would interpret as "no Classic".

Well, they promised that GNOME would rely on so called 'llvm pipe' to
get 3D even if normal 3D is not accessible, but … 'llvm pipe' seems to
be working on amd64 (maybe i386) only, so all other archtectures have
XFCE by default.

>From the personal experience - said 'llvm pipe' just segfaults if amd64
jessie is running in qemu-kvm. Some llvm bug, I presume. Or qemu one.
Not that it really matters to me.


> > > > > > Will Debian 8, when released, provide the "GNOME Classic"
> > > > > > interface?
> > > > > 
> > > > > From the above:
> > > > > 
> > > > > "If you want to keep an interface closer to the GNOME 2.30
> > > > > version in wheezy, you can select the “GNOME Classic” session
> > > > > at the login prompt. It will bring you an improved version of
> > > > > the traditional panel. You can still edit the panel to add more
> > > > > applets, by using the hidden alt+right click combination. "
> > > > 
> > > > Um, wheezy has GNOME 3.4. It's squeeze which had GNOME 2.30.
> > > > Apparently this info is outdated.
> > > 
> > > I don't use Gnome, so I wouldn't know :) As the top of the page said
> > > "Debian 8", I didn't inspect the link any closer.
> > 
> > Hey, *I* stopped using GNOME back then Debian stable was called etch.
> 
> Maybe this will get more people to switch to something like Xfce or
> just a plain WM :)

No. Never underestimate the power of default installation.
If default installation gives one GNOME - one will stick to the GNOME.

Unless, of course, user knows exactly what is needed. In that case I
fail to see the need of using GNOME in the first place :)


> > But you don't need software to be installed to check its version
> > because they give you apt-cache. And if you don't like apt-cache -
> > they give you aptitude :)
> 
> Not on the machine I'm on right now - it runs Slackware :) I guess
> there's no problem in running apt-cache here, but I can't really see a
> good reason for doing so :) It will be moved to Jessie pretty soon,
> though, just haven't found the time yet.

Unless Slackware stops giving you chroot(1) - you can run both Slackware
and Debian at the same time. The reason to do so (short of building
debs the way it's intended) is escaping from me too.

Reco


Reply to: