Re: Iceape

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Iceape
From: Curt <curty@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:02:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] slrnmg14ae.2b6.curty@einstein.electron.org>
References: <[🔎] 20150311151455.GB22524@tomgeorge.info> <[🔎] 201503111556.27085.lisi.reisz@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20150311160036.GB18365@darac.org.uk> <[🔎] 201503111622.11815.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>

On 2015-03-11, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, your output proves that it ISN'T. All the results are virtual
>> packages, each of which is an Add-On for iceape (caused, presumably,
>> because e.g. xul-ext-adblock-plus provides ice$ANIMAL-adblock-plus.
>
> Doh!  I saw lots of iceape entries and didn't read it properly.  Sorry Bret.  
> My bad.
>

Well, you proved *something* anyway, which is the essential thing.

Reply to:

References:
- Iceape
  - From: "Thomas H. George" <lists@tomgeorge.info>
- Re: Iceape
  - From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
- Re: Iceape
  - From: Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk>
- Re: Iceape
  - From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Subject: Re: svn, subversion, repos
Next by Date: Re: Installing Jessie on a computer that current has Windows 7 on it
Previous by thread: Re: Iceape
Next by thread: Re: Iceape
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread