Re: Okular vs printer, okular 1, printer 0
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 11:49:13 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 15:29:11 Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 25 Feb 2015 at 15:03:31 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 14:46:36 Brian wrote:
> > > > On Wed 25 Feb 2015 at 15:27:44 +0100, Petter Adsen wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:03:17 +0000
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a 14.10 machine right here, and there is no driver for his
> > > > > printer there. I've checked.
> > > >
> > > > Not surprising; the licence for the Brother software doesn't permit
> > > > distribution.
> > >
> > > Then it can't have been in Lucid either, surely?
> >
> > I imagine not. That was my point.
> >
> > > > The lack of advice on the HL-3170CDW at openprinting is an indication
> > > > that no user of it has added any, not a judgement on whether it works
> > > > on Linux.
> > >
> > > Yes, but if there had been advice it woudl have been useful.
> >
> > Of course.
> >
> > > So do you agree with Gene that it is a Wheezy bug?
> >
> > That's a big jump from what I said. And what bug is it you are talking
> > about? There have been a number of assertions in this thread. None lead
> > me to think that Wheezy is heading for imminent breakdown on the printing
> > front. :)
>
> I htink that it is a case of watch this space!! TDE may yet save the day.
>
> Lisi
I wonder what my chances of creating some softlinks and making the rest of the
system use it? Bears a closer look for sure.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Reply to: