Re: Okular vs printer, okular 1, printer 0
On Wed 25 Feb 2015 at 12:31:05 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 12:10:05 Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 25 Feb 2015 at 11:20:20 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 10:11:51 Curt wrote:
> > > > On 2015-02-25, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > CUPS has not provided information about them them because it gets its
> > > > > information from the Duplex option in the PPD file. The brother PPD
> > > > > does not provide such an option. There is no bug.
> > > >
> > > > Then I can't understand why Gene said he could print a test page in
> > > > duplex using the brother PPD after setting the duplex option as a
> > > > default in the web interface.
> > >
> > > I didn't understand him so to say. :-/ I thought that he said that he
> > > couldn't print duplex at all at the moment. If it isn't in the PPD then
> > > that explains it.
> >
> > The facility to print duplex *is* in the PPD. Displaying this information
> > in the GTK and Qt print dialogues is a different matter.
>
> I'm lost now.
>
> > > > > CUPS has not provided information about them them because it gets its
> > > > > information from the Duplex option in the PPD file. The brother PPD
> > > > > does not provide such an option.
>
> > The facility to print duplex *is* in the PPD.
>
> Both from you. Could you explain?
Have you looked in the PPD to see whether
(a) the "Duplex" option is here
(b) the facility to print duplex is present?
Reply to: