Re: End of hypocrisy ?
On Thursday 07 August 2014 10:24:13 Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 16:53:10 +0300
>
> David Baron <d_baron@012.net.il> wrote:
> > Wish there were not so many bugs around systemd. No objection to it
> > as long as it works.
>
> It's a lot harder to code for few bugs if the program interfaces with
> everything and its dog, as opposed to the program doing one thing and
> doing it well.
>
> I would have been surprised if systemd *didn't* have a lot of bugs. It
> won't surprise me at all if, five or ten years from now, people talk
> about systemd as a mistake we made and later abandoned, kind of like
> New Coke in 1985:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_coke
OT: Yes, New Coke. Not such a mistake but an advertising Coup. A lot of noise
over nothing but noise gets results.
Unfortunately, in our field, noise is more a sign of trouble.
All those packages are now 208-7. Several bugs closed, a few more added for
good measure. Anyone using the systemd and udev 208-7? Or wait ... for how
long? Of put n the command line and install shim?
Reply to: