On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:25:42PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 05:50:47PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote: > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:44:14PM -0400, Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Joel Rees > > > > Sent: 05/07/14 09:01 PM > > > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > Subject: Re: Is zeitgeist safe? > > > > > > > > But this particular thread is not serving the interests of debian users. > > > > Old news. Most of it incorrectly reported. > > > > > > I differ. I do not for once believe Debian OS is free of bugs and bad coding. The recent Heartbleed vulnerability is one case in point. > > > > Heartbleed isn't an indication of bad coding. Also, what distros are > > completely bug free? > > > > > Curiously enough, the NSA also claimed that the news concerning Nils Torvalds was incorrectly reported. > > > > "Nils" Torvalds? > > LMGTFY: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nils_Torvalds > Aha. It's a different individual. I stand corrected. -- Bob Holtzman Our company's mission is to enable data-stream synergies with confluent bullshit mining,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature