Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?

To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
From: berenger.morel@neutralite.org
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:07:44 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 8d7cc84efe87cce6532324bb05e12ab6@neutralite.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20141212120520.GB1248@sid.nuvreauspam>
References: <[🔎] 5485A51A.7040403@ix.netcom.com> <[🔎] 3d6a00a1c8bddc88b517b4e19cc681dd@neutralite.org> <[🔎] 5485E70E.7060900@ix.netcom.com> <[🔎] 5552329519ee0297c23b323f00bfbd3a@neutralite.org> <[🔎] 20141212120520.GB1248@sid.nuvreauspam>



Le 12.12.2014 13:05, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :

On Jo, 11 dec 14, 17:33:51, berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:

Plus, it's not portable
(anyone have seen dbus on windows? not sure, but I doubt it's on*BSD, too)
unlike sockets.


From http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus/

    D-Bus is very portable to any Linux or UNIX flavor, and a port to
    Windows is in progress.

Kind regards,
Andrei


Nice to learn about that, and sorry for wrong assumption.

Does someone use it on a non-linux based computer? Any experience aboutthat would be appreciated.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
  - From: Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com>
- Re: Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
  - From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>

References:
- 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
  - From: Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
  - From: berenger.morel@neutralite.org
- Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
  - From: Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
  - From: berenger.morel@neutralite.org
- Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
  - From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
Next by Date: Re: Skipping fsck during boot with systemd?
Previous by thread: Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
Next by thread: Re: 9p/plumber to replace D-Bus?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread