Re: Perfect Jessie is something like this...
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
Jerry Stuckle:
But just the fact there are people who consider systemd to be
> problematic enough to consider forking Debian should not be ignored.
Denis Roio already has dyne:bolic.
*
http://homepage.ntlworld.com./jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/run-scripts-and-service-units-side-by-side.html
You knew that "we are Veteran UNIX Admins" was actually Denis Roio,
didn't you?
I could be wrong, but it strikes me that the strongest voices for a fork
are coming from folks who run servers - as it is those of us who spend a
lot of time on custom "plumbing" are the ones most effected by the shift
to systemd.
Unfortunately, dyne:bolic is not designed for server side deployments.
I'm not sure I can identify any distros that still focus primarily on
server deployment (as differentiated from the BSD and illumos worlds -
that primarily seem to focus on server-side deployments.)
Personally, my concern is that an awful lot of server-side stuff that I
run on seems to be packaged FIRST for Debian. I'm a bit concerned about
the impact of the shift toward systemd on the overall upstream ecosystem.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Reply to: