[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [exim4] Testing and making sense of smtp output



Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> writes:

> On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 04:12:04 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:45:44PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> >> > And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
>> > snip
>> >> Egad ...  I just noticed that was from a different machine... but the
>> >> format is the same on all of mine.  So still should stand as something
>> >> to critique/
>> >
>> > Debian's exim4 will take the contents of /etc/mailname over the dns name by
>> > default. I'd recommend putting the fqdn that you want exim to use there.
>> 
>> You can also specify it in exims' configuration.  Unless you do have
>> good reason to do so, I'd advise against it and let exim use the host
>> name (which the automatic configuration which I don't exactly recommend
>> hopefully lets exim use unless you tell it otherwise).
>
> The HELO cannot be specified using dpkg-reconfigure. It is taken from
> /etc/hosts.
>
> /etc/mailname can be specified with dpkg-reconfigure. It is not the best
> of ideas to leave it blank.
>
> There is no connection between /etc/mailname and the HELO.


"primary_hostname 	Use: main 	Type: string 	Default: see below

This specifies the name of the current host. It is used in the default
EHLO or HELO command for outgoing SMTP messages (changeable via the
helo_data option in the smtp transport), and as the default for
qualify_domain. The value is also used by default in some SMTP response
messages from an Exim server. This can be changed dynamically by setting
smtp_active_hostname."[1]


There is no mentioning of /etc/mailname here.  Perhaps that's an
ideosyncrasy of the automatic configuration.


[1]: http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-main_configuration.html


-- 
Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons
might swallow us.  Finally, this fear has become reasonable.


Reply to: