Re: alpine status?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: alpine status?
From: Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:43:20 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20141016064320.GB10790@chew.redmars.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CACX6j8P-Y6BxdchHmg55YASo8mmzNt+9+ipW2cHX=7+dZSDuBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.64.1409041104010.78309@server1.shellworld.net> <CACX6j8PJot1PcdPhAU3Txdz--6Y=pcSwF7ptqjZWnJr_VaAcEw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CA+AKB6Ernbx5gJ3SScjBRrTekFKzegSmsoarvHo8qXJRyJR24Q@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.1410150029270.15461@bret-dd-workstation.busby.net> <[🔎] CACX6j8PKrOLjGN00oKwNysdRWd+XFco6Y3a71uFs=_fFZzQQiQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CA+AKB6EM_LNO0BooDn2O3tqtFM0y=vxdLr45kXN_vn8+PcTJKQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CACX6j8P-Y6BxdchHmg55YASo8mmzNt+9+ipW2cHX=7+dZSDuBA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:33:06AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> So, was it correct that " Bret's information is out of date.", as you posted?

The guy is subscribed now, mistakes happen, how about everyone just moves on?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: alpine status?
  - From: francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com>
- Re: alpine status?
  - From: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net>
- Re: alpine status?
  - From: Bret Busby <bret.busby@gmail.com>
- Re: alpine status?
  - From: francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com>
- Re: alpine status?
  - From: Bret Busby <bret.busby@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)
Next by Date: Re: debian-advocacy?
Previous by thread: Re: alpine status?
Next by thread: Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread