Re: Conflict of interest in Debian
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 12:53:52 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900
> Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2014/10/15 1:47 "Brian" <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>:
> > >
>
> > > Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted
> > > character assassination of a group dedicated workers.
> >
> > Do you realize that a lot of your posts, jumping on anti-systemd
> > topics, might appear, to casual examination, to be innuendo and/or
> > character assassination?
>
> Yes. Let's get rid of the innuendo.
>
> It is my belief that Red Hat is foisting systemd on Linux for the
> purpose of making Linux harder to repair and manage, and have hired
> clever Rube Goldberg software creator Leonart Poettering to create
> something that works, but in the long term will be a house of cards
> only specialists (primarily Red Hat specialists, they hope) can work on.
>
> Well, that's certainly character assassination (and well deserved in my
> opinion), but I think I got rid of the innuendo :-)
Can one detect a bit of 'tongue in cheek' here? A modicum of reason
being supressed for a laugh?
These are your beliefs. They are to be respected. If you also believed
that the Earth was flat and the Sun rotated around it, or Elvis was
alive and well and living in Barnsley we would also treat those beliefs
with the respect they deserved.
The practical outcome of having beliefs is not that they have to be
advanced time after time and on every conceivable occasion in -user.
Reply to: