Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Conflict of interest in Debian
From: John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:35:38 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87iojlcsed.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org>
Reply-to: jhasler@newsguy.com (John Hasler)
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20141015005107.2e9736c1@mydesq2.domain.cxm> (Steve Litt's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:51:07 -0400")
References: <[🔎] 543D0F78.7060604@ix.netcom.com> <[🔎] 20141014161017.GB4812@teltox.donarmstrong.com> <[🔎] 543DC16A.7050104@ix.netcom.com> <[🔎] 20141015005107.2e9736c1@mydesq2.domain.cxm>

Steve Litt writes:
> Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
> surprise.

Better Red Hat than just about anybody else.
-- 
John Hasler 
jhasler@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA

Reply to:

References:
- Conflict of interest in Debian
  - From: Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Conflict of interest in Debian
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Re: Conflict of interest in Debian
  - From: Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Conflict of interest in Debian
  - From: Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>

Prev by Date: Who is systemd-gpt-auto-generator, and why does s/he not like my partition table?
Next by Date: Re: Conflict of interest in Debian
Previous by thread: Re: Conflict of interest in Debian
Next by thread: Re: Conflict of interest in Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread