Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork
From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 08:06:19 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 201409270806.19314.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140926205002.407d02a4@mydesq2.domain.cxm>
References: <[🔎] CALtyatGjC-2-yqy8QgYunsR2_BDWhsGNM0jdhPxhaMX13njzGw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 871tqx9aot.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] 20140926205002.407d02a4@mydesq2.domain.cxm>

On Saturday 27 September 2014 01:50:02 Steve Litt wrote:
> And for every one of us that gets silenced, three more pop up.

They don't.  Except perhaps in oyur dreams.

Lisi

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Let's have a vote! I was just banned from debian forum for posting a systemd critical message.
  - From: Gregory Smith <gregorysmith1974a@gmail.com>
- Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>
- Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork
  - From: Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd upstream
Next by Date: Re: Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd upstream
Previous by thread: Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork
Next by thread: Re: 2 fork or ~2 fork
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread