Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 07:56:27 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 201409260756.27262.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CALtyatEDjo2+bpP6xCrKPdHKvVOUG+-sqhb0RJXML0o0i-dW_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CALtyatFS_6jHmVkLnk7THKa=ZPzp__5d6u4cMkh3WgW_FgSAXA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 5424828F.4060304@gmail.com> <[🔎] CALtyatEDjo2+bpP6xCrKPdHKvVOUG+-sqhb0RJXML0o0i-dW_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Friday 26 September 2014 07:24:14 Gregory Smith wrote:
> Club or not, common law criminal fraud applies.

Which jurisdiction?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Gregory Smith <gregorysmith1974a@gmail.com>
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com>
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Gregory Smith <gregorysmith1974a@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
Next by Date: Re: security camera software/RPi
Previous by thread: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
Next by thread: Re: Let's have a vote! I was just banned from debian forum for posting a systemd critical message.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread