This was an orchestrated fraudulent oligarchic takeover and charges need to be brought agains you and them.
On Thursday, September 25, 2014, Steve Litt <
slitt@troubleshooters.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:46:56 +0200
Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. September 2014, 01:45:50 schrieb lee:
> > Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> writes:
> > > Am Montag, 22. September 2014, 23:50:46 schrieb lee:
> > >> Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> writes:
> > >>
> > >> Do you really think they will be able to prevent all the other
> > >> software from depending on a particular init system or parts of
> > >> it?
> > >
> > > Well… thats to be taken upstream, isn´t it?
> >
> > Then why don't the developers or the distributions do just that?
> > Nobody cares when one user or another questions whether it's a good
> > idea to depend on systemd, and it might be much different if a lot
> > of developers and/or whole distributions would, in the interest of
> > their users, question this dependency and refuse their support
> > eventually until the issues systemd and software depending on it
> > brings about.
>
> […]
> > Fedora does already depend on systemd --- and I would say
> > completely. Or do you see a choice here?
>
> And exactly *how* is this relevant to Debian?
Well, for one thing, it was one reason the DDs used to select systemd.
SteveT
Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 20140925113444.23f63a11@mydesq2.domain.cxm" target="_blank">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20140925113444.23f63a11@mydesq2.domain.cxm