[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd upstream



On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:46:56 +0200
Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, 25. September 2014, 01:45:50 schrieb lee:
> > Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> writes:
> > > Am Montag, 22. September 2014, 23:50:46 schrieb lee:
> > >> Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> writes:
> > >> 
> > >> Do you really think they will be able to prevent all the other
> > >> software from depending on a particular init system or parts of
> > >> it?
> > > 
> > > Well… thats to be taken upstream, isn´t it?
> > 
> > Then why don't the developers or the distributions do just that?
> > Nobody cares when one user or another questions whether it's a good
> > idea to depend on systemd, and it might be much different if a lot
> > of developers and/or whole distributions would, in the interest of
> > their users, question this dependency and refuse their support
> > eventually until the issues systemd and software depending on it
> > brings about.
> 
> […]
> > Fedora does already depend on systemd --- and I would say
> > completely. Or do you see a choice here?
> 
> And exactly *how* is this relevant to Debian?

Well, for one thing, it was one reason the DDs used to select systemd.

SteveT

Steve Litt                *  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance


Reply to: