Re: systemd bug closed - next steps?
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:11:03PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 22 sep 14, 21:17:28, Marty wrote:
> >
> > 1) The goal is "modular Debian." Multi-init is the means to achieve
> > it. Being tied to one init system is what caused Debian’s problems,
> > and the replacement did not fix it. A modular system has to support
> > all init systems, including systemd, clones and custom inits.
>
> While you're at it how about also making sure we can have a dietlibc or
> uClibc version of Debian? After all, depending on glibc is also not very
> good. Oh, and don't forget about udev and X.Org. There is already work
> in progress trying to compile Debian with something other than GCC, so
> you don't need to worry about that.
>
> Yes this is a joke, but only in part. It's very interesting how suddenly
> people are so worried about Debian being tied to one piece of software,
> while this has been happening all along.
I just had a look and didn't realise how closely Debian is reliant on the
C language! Surely, this can't be good!
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: