Re: Jessie and Systemd integration
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:22:21AM -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
> Thanks very much, everyone.
>
> I especially appreciate the dependency information with no bias. Just the
> facts is always appreciated on an emotional issue such as this.
>
> The truth is that I can live with a stray library or a shim - but the rest
> leaves me concerned.
>
> Setting aside all of the controversy, there seems to be one undeniable
> design fact. Unless I am overlooking something relevant, Systemd is adding
> a single point of failure on a critical process chain. On a desktop, I don't
> care, but on a 24/7 server that is something I really can't afford. Any
> server will eventually fail, but I don't feel comfortable risking cron
> timing, startup and logging failure all in one swoop by having systemd
> control everything.
>
> I know you can disable portions of systemd, because I have, but the
> pervasive nature of the package dependencies makes it much harder to ignore.
>
> From the sound of things, I'd very much like to give Debian 8 the benefit of
> the doubt. I'll wait and see, if there are more posts and not dismiss it
> entirely. Until more information comes in down the road, it is probably
> prudent for me to continue to look at a server migration plan that firmly
> does not include systemd.
>
>
Hello TJ
I have been using Debian for almost 14 years continuosly, and i had to
transfered 1 server to OpenBSD, because the comments in this list are uncertain; i
can not wait for Jessi to do the transition.
Bye.
Reply to: