[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Jessie and Systemd integration



On Thu 18 Sep 2014 at 12:41:40 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 11:02:11 schrieb Brian:
> > On Thu 18 Sep 2014 at 11:27:32 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > The following packages will be REMOVED:
> > Install systemd-shim first.
> 
> It was installed as I ran the apt commend and it still is, cause if systemd
> doesn´t boot I like to say init=/sbin/init :)
> 
> martin@merkaba:~> dpkg -l | egrep
> "systemd-shim|cgmanager|sysvinit-core|systemd-sysv" |  cut -c1-70
> ii  cgmanager                                      0.32-4             
> ii  libcgmanager0:amd64                            0.32-4             
> ii  systemd-shim                                   8-2                
> ii  sysvinit-core                                  2.88dsf-53.4       
> 
> martin@merkaba:~> cat /proc/cmdline 
> BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.17.0-rc5-tp520 root=/dev/mapper/sata-debian ro
> rootflags=subvol=debian init=/bin/systemd resume=/dev/mapper/sata-swap

The OP said

  >> a)   If I will have to have systemd installed even if I do not want it.

You replied

   > I wanted to say no as I thought systemd-shim *and* cgmanager together can
   > replace it, but according to

At this point I wanted to say that systemd-shim and cgmanager replace
systemd-sysv. not systemd. I let it go; my mistake.

You went on to write

   > merkaba:~> LANG=C apt-get purge systemd

Another mistake on my part: I decided that "systemd" was a typo for
"systemd-sysv", especially as later on in your post you seemed to
understand that in #727708 the TC were concerned with systemd as PID 1.
The systemd-sysv package ensures that the wishes of the TC to make
systemd the default init system are carried out.

So, sorry about that. Your observation on libpam-systemd is correct.
Note that the TC chose "...to not pass a resolution at the current time
about whether software may require specific init systems"


Reply to: