Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
From: Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:42:55 +0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140916144254.GA27691@x101h>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 871trbk8jp.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org>
References: <[🔎] 20140916085133.GE795@rail.eu.org> <[🔎] 20140916083510.6476f26d@mydesq2.domain.cxm> <[🔎] 20140916125636.GA24602@x101h> <[🔎] 871trbk8jp.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org>

 Hi.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 08:18:50AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> File a bug.

Why would I? mountall is a part of upstart, and those Ubuntu guys can do
all kinds of crazy foo for all I care.
And for LXC I prefer using straight lxc tools over this python-infested
hipster docker :)

Reco

Reply to:

References:
- docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>
- Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>
- Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com>
- Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Creating a forum for systemd debate
Next by Date: Re: mysql command waiting endlessly (lenny)
Previous by thread: Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
Next by thread: Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread