[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: missing LSB tags and overrides



On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Any suggestions on how to fix this please?
> 
> 
> insserv: warning: script 'K01kerneld' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'K01apache' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'S15modutils' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'S15libdevmapper1.02' missing LSB tags and
> overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'S15xfree86-common' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'xfree86-common' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'libdevmapper1.02' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'modutils' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'iptables' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'kerneld' missing LSB tags and overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'apache' missing LSB tags and overrides

Step 1. Purge unconfigured packages providing init scripts. That is,
init scripts are considers conffiles so removing the package doesn't
remove the file. Because the package is removed, it doesn't get updates
to fix problems such as above.

Step 2. If you have any init scripts that you developed yourself, add
proper headers[1] to the script.

Step 3. If you have any init scripts that are provided by a third party,
add the proper headers to a file in /etc/insserv/overrides. The filename
must match that of the init script (not the symlinks thereto).


[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/

> 
> -- 
> Tony van der Hoff  | mailto:tony@vanderhoff.org
> Ariège, France     |
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 53CF6714.9090305@vanderhoff.org">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 53CF6714.9090305@vanderhoff.org
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: