Re: UEFI
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 19.49:12 Bret Busby wrote:
> It is my understanding (and, once again, I am no expert), that two
> distinct advantages of a UEFI/GPT system ofer what it replaced, are
> that no differentiation exists, between primary and other partitions,
> and, a UEFI/GPT system, can have up to 128 partitions.
I don't know how many partitions I can create without UEFI/GPT, but the only
limitation I ran into was that of *primary* partitions
> Now, (...) with MS Windows 7 etc, taking up at least 3 primary partitions,
> on the systems before UEFI/GPT)(...) Then, if a person wanted to instal a
> version of UNIX, such as a version of BSD, a primary partition was required
Well, that's anything but a standard situation. I've only used GPT for
Hackintoshes, I stopped using Windows in 1992 (yep, windows 3.0) and I can't
figure out why I would install another *nix-like system (except for fun and
discovery, but I have enough older computers around to dedicate one to this
sort of trial. Any OS that *requires* a primary partition to install is badly
coded, or old (or both...).
So this for me sums up the question: if your computer is to run linux only (as
was the OP's), there is no reason to use UEFI/GPT but for the need for
partitions over 2 TB.
For complex setups, it may be of interrest.
Thierry
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UEFI
- From: Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>
- References:
- UEFI
- From: Benedito Junior <benedito5@gmail.com>
- Re: UEFI
- From: Bzzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com>
- Re: UEFI
- From: Bret Busby <bret.busby@gmail.com>