Re: Is grub perfect? (was Re: Does LXDE really require lightdm?)
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Is grub perfect? (was Re: Does LXDE really require lightdm?)
- From: Rusi Mody <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
- Message-id: <[🔎] email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <nyRVU-ZZfirstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <CAAr43iM_FEyy0EyeLpZHGq5J_2G3xSDkXx05bdBC2pKL1b5_CA@mail.gmail.com> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <20140628154000.GA3252@copernicus.demon.co.uk> <ny334-6kNfirstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <CAOdo=Sw6t7UoNvRoU2Yk3OE02tg8-prty-p5Tp6xopi=LxDpaA@mail.gmail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <CAOdo=SyQe3n25e0tX9-QT_VbZovFOgQeuhOOZgPtjuC--JEuLg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, July 1, 2014 3:40:02 AM UTC+5:30, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 30 Jun 2014 at 14:05:10 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Rusi Mody wrote:
> >>> I use the grub command configfile (also multiboot).
> >>> What do they do? Where are they documented?
> >>> [I got the tips on usage on the grub mailing list]
> >> I don't know whether configfile and multiboot are documented in the
> >> info pages (I find info unusable) but this is the upstream grub
> >> manual:
> > A few years ago the complaints about grub's documentation were possibly
> > justified. Today, less so, And even if there are improvements which can
> > made it is hardly a justification for the "bring back grub legacy and
> > give us abandoned software" faction to be considered at all seriously.
> > configfile is documented in the info pages. The multiboot command
> > replaces the kernel command; you're on your own with that!
> Why do you think that grub2's multiboot replaces grub1's kernel?
> Its main use is to load the core.img of another grub2 install. I don't
> think that you can load a kernel with it.
The grub guys explaining (to me!) the configfile and multiboot commands:
I really dont want to get into the quality of docs argument.
Just giving the above to offset the claim that grub devs are 'patronizing' --
this has not been my experience