Re: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
From: Jerry Stuckle <jstuckle@attglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 21:53:42 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 5393C226.5010103@attglobal.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] BAY179-W14D82466A80B29F34F3C4EEB2E0@phx.gbl>
References: <[🔎] 5393395C.8050905@yahoo.fr> <[🔎] BAY179-W14D82466A80B29F34F3C4EEB2E0@phx.gbl>

On 6/7/2014 9:40 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:



 > Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 18:10:04 +0200
 > From: me_buss777@yahoo.fr
 > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
 > Subject: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
 >
 > Did I miss something ? ^^
 >
Have you consulted the Debian Reference Manual before you posted your
question here?

Don't be another Horatio.

--------
Jerry S.

Warning - faker here. Check the email headers - this was NOT from myaccount.


Jerry

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
  - From: Diogene Laerce <me_buss777@yahoo.fr>

References:
- Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
  - From: Diogene Laerce <me_buss777@yahoo.fr>
- RE: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
  - From: Jerry Stuckle <j.stuckle@outlook.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Should I install chkrootkit?
Next by Date: Re: Should I install chkrootkit?
Previous by thread: RE: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
Next by thread: Re: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread