Ahoj, Dňa Mon, 19 May 2014 00:46:57 +1000 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> napísal: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Gary Dale <garydale@torfree.net> > wrote: > > Just as no one forced Americans to own slaves, the fact that > > slavery was allowed was an insult to notion of freedom. Arguing > > that the "freedom" to choose whether to own slaves or not made > > Americans freer would be called ridiculous by any sane person, yet > > the same argument is being bandied about in this discussion as if > > it made any sense. > > > > The Free Software Foundation got this one right. > > Is it wrong, then, for Samba to be included in the 'main' section? It > encourages the use of both Debian and Windows, making it that much > easier for people to use non-free software. Is it therefore a bad > thing? What about the various tools that read and write Microsoft > Office file formats? Are they bad because they give people the freedom > to work with non-free systems? Not previous, but you are wrong in comparison (or example selection). The Samba doesn't allow to use of proprietary software. Samba only uses the SMB protocol (i can be wrong, but it is standardized), which Windows uses (as primary) too. But you can connect two Samba between themselves, then no Windows is needed. Can you use free software for the DRM? If yes, then i am wrong and your example is OK. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature