Re: nm-applet reports 802.11 connected, but can't actually communicate over network?
Carl Fink, 10.02.2014:
> I'm trying to use my Testing system with a Realtek rtl8188ce 802.11 adapter.
> I use Gnome's nm-applet to connect to the wireless access point, and it
> accepts the passphrase and connects, fine. However, all attempts to do
> anything over the network fail, e.g. ping, traceroute, attempts to open a
> web page all time out with no result.
>
> My first thought was name resolution but I get the same thing with an IP
> address.
>
> My Windows 8.1 ultrabook connects to this network fine. So does my Android
> phone. So does my (company-issue) iPad. Why is the Debian system failing?
>
> I do have the Realtek nonfree firmware installed and this system worked OK
> in another building using a different WiFi router.
Did that router use the same kind of encryption as this one? Or are
there any other differences you can think of?
> Output of ifconfig:
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1
> RX packets:4151 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:4151 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:883087 (862.3 KiB) TX bytes:883087 (862.3 KiB)
>
> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:e0:4c:a1:07:a5
> inet addr:192.168.1.109 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:4cff:fea1:7a5/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:796 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:828 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:251403 (245.5 KiB) TX bytes:103301 (100.8 KiB)
>
>
>
> Output of route: -v
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 wlan0
> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 wlan0
>
> Thanks in advance for any help you may be able to provide.
Any chance you need to register your MAC address for this network?
Reply to: