[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Gnome 3 fail scenario




When we last left Bob he was preparing to upgrade a host from squeeze to wheezy, using apt-get. That has been on the whole a roaring success, with only a sprinkling of issues -- the usual headache with dovecot, due *entirely* to pilot error.

Why oh why do I ever choose the package maintainer's config for a package I have already config'd? It's one of those questions that plagues perennial philosophy. But I digress...

The host in question is a remote "vps," in this case a "linode," that for years happily ran gnome 2. On the new wheezy install (using vpn) ICEwm and XFCE-4 start up very nicely indeed, thank you, but the gnome flavor that came with wheezy (which I am calling, I hope not mistakenly, "gnome 3") balks, with the following syslog lines:

-- syslog gluck --
Jan 25 18:52:23 sixtiessurvivor gnome-session[23363]: Gdk-WARNING: gnome-session: Fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server :1.#012 Jan 25 18:54:31 sixtiessurvivor gnome-session[23530]: WARNING: GSIdleMonitor: IDLETIME counter not found Jan 25 18:54:31 sixtiessurvivor gnome-session[23530]: WARNING: Session 'gnome' runnable check failed: Exited with code 1 Jan 25 18:54:31 sixtiessurvivor gnome-session[23530]: WARNING: Unable to determine session: Unable to lookup session information for process '23530' Jan 25 18:54:31 sixtiessurvivor gnome-session[23530]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file -- syslog gluck --

Installing the 'gnome-session-fallback' package has given me a somewhat usable gnome WM, but everything from my previous gnome desktop has disappeared :-(. With this last complaint I am not sure whether I may be asking/expecting too much.

If those syslog lines inspire anyone to expostulate on gnome, debian, or the state of Western Civilization, I would love to hear it!

Thank you all faithful assembled,

--
IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is
confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive
persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational
metaphysical beliefs.


Reply to: