Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit

[cletusjenkins <cletusjenkins@zoho.com>]

>> I'm not arguing one is better than the other, just in all situations
>> neither is the best. You said in another reply that we haven't created
>> a computer that can create as we do, 

>What do yo mean we? Just because one person is a good musician doesn't
>mean we are. Just because one person is a great craftsman
>doesn't mean all people *can* be.

Yes, I forgot to exclude from the discussion the untermenschen among us.

>> be out-competed and certainly shortly become extinct. But I don't
>> think human-like creativity is restricted humans. Any sufficiently
>> advanced alien lifeform could reproduce such creativity. 

>You're making that up! :)

So you believe there us something special about human brains or the nerve cells they are composed of? Perhaps the untermenschen are composed of something other than what _we_ are, which explains their sloth and poor craftsmanship. All human knowledge has and still is leading to the conclusion there is nothing special about humans or our place in the universe.

Exactly what factoid do you know that could possibly prevent computers as complex and powerful as a human brain, or sentient alien species not being as creative as humanity? Not likely to be the 100% the same due to the different substrate, culture and a myriad of differences, but to say such beings cannot be as creative as humans reminds me of europeans in the past claiming other races couldn't be as intelligent or civilized as they were because of some intrinsic flaw.