Re: Without SKYPE?
On 5/2/2013 15:24, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 02 May 2013 at 15:13:51 -0400, staticsafe wrote:
>
>> On 5/2/2013 15:10, Brian wrote:
>>> On Thu 02 May 2013 at 19:25:57 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since you didn't clarify what you mean by "alternative to Skype", i'll
>>>> go with XMPP.
>>>
>>> It is the OP who needs to clarify what he wants. My view is clear: there
>>> is no alternative to Skype in the software field. It reigns supreme. If
>>> you want to contact someone on the Skype network - use it,
>>>
>>> XNPP? Isn't that an instant messaging protocol?
>>>
>>>
>> See Jingle [0], an extension over the XMPP protocol.
>>
>> [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jingle_%28protocol%29
>
> I did. How does it allow someone not running the *Skype spoftware* to
> conect with the Skype network?
>
>
It doesn't. The Skype protocol is proprietary.
--
staticsafe
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
Please don't top post - http://goo.gl/YrmAb
Don't CC me! I'm subscribed to whatever list I just posted on.
Reply to: