On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:50:11PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Gregory Nowak wrote:
According to the above, I would say only sda and sdb are bad, sda
being the worst of the two. I stand to be corrected as always.
Yeah - that's what it looks like to me as well (having gotten back
to a screen other than my smartphone).
I hope that supplier I got this drives from will be willing to replace them on
basis of this results. Anyway, since it's RAID, they can be only replaced one
by one.
One question: how do you handle replacements like this? If supplier is willing
to replace bad drives, it is necessary to return bad ones, but data on those
drives are not intended to be seen by third parties.
It also looks like those drives are pretty old:
40 Head_Flying_Hours 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 174414326932768
241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 23166370191361
242 Total_LBAs_Read 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 174661697951516
They work 24/7 for more than a year (over 400 days). That's not really old. My
WD desktop drive have 3.2 years of Power_On_Hours but with
Raw_Read_Error_Rate=0, Reallocated_Sector_Ct=0 and Seek_Error_Rate=0.