[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What if I choose install text-based mode than X?



在 2013年8月23日星期五UTC+8上午2时30分02秒,Catalin Soare写道:
> On Aug 22, 2013 5:24 PM, <berenge...@neutralite.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > Le 22.08.2013 15:22, 郭靖 a écrit :
> 
> >
> 
> >> 在 2013年8月22日星期四UTC+8下午6时50分01秒,Ralf Mardorf写道:
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 19:41 -0700, 郭靖 wrote:
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> > I've burned a Live CD, and I tried it on VirtualBox, it looked fine
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> > but I chose the wrong place for GRUB, at last it didn't run well.
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> More information is needed to comment this.
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> > is Synaptic different from apt-get? Which of them has more softwares?
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> Both use the same list of repositories, so the same software is
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> available.
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> > mc looks fine and I may tried out.
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> mcedit is the command to access it's editor directly and
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> mcedit /path/to/file/foo will open the editor and a file directly. nano
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> is another easy to use editor, but you should know the basics how to use
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> vi, or vim, since those are the editors that usually are separated from
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> the rest of the userspace and available if everything should be broken
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> on UNIX like systems.
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> If you want to learn Linux this way I would recommend to use another
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> distro, but this are only my 2 cents. I for example prefer Arch over
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> Debian. Beside the repositories that provide binaries Arch comes with a
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> build system similar to FreeBSD ports, packages neither for this build
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> system, nor for the binaries are split, as they are for Debian. Arch
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> packages follow upstream, IOW a lib will not get a separated package,
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> headers don't get separated packages too. Building packages for Arch is
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> much easier than doing it for Debian. The _real_ rolling release model
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> of Arch does provide latest _stable_ software, so if you want to develop
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> using a lot of new stuff from git, svn etc., you wouldn't run that easy
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> into issues, as you'll do when using Debian.
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> > If I dual-boot Debian on my MBP, then install rEFIt, would it be fine?
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> I don't know.
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> Debian:
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> https://wiki.debian.org/MacBook/DebianInstallTutorial
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> https://wiki.debian.org/MacBookPro
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> Arch:
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/MacBook
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> http://codylittlewood.com/arch-linux-on-macbook-pro-installation/
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> > And can I send and/or receive mailing list or emails, and talk on IRC
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> > channels?
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> You are already doing it ;), but yes you can do it using Linux too :).
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> Regards,
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> Ralf
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> --
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-us...@lists.debian.org
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
> 
> >>>
> 
> >>> Archive: [🔎] 1377168118.714.21.camel@archlinux">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 1377168118.714.21.camel@archlinux
> 
> >>
> 
> >>
> 
> >> I think you misunderstood, mc here means Midnight Commander, a file manager.
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Arch has been considered before, but I don't have a great knowledge
> 
> >> on Linux, hence I don't think it a nice idea to do so.
> 
> >>
> 
> >> BTW, I mean can I use IRC on text-based OS?
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > Yes, and you can even browse the web if you want: you just need a ncurse client to do that.
> 
> >
> 
> > To find one that will suit your needs, I can only give an advice: run aptitude, install debtags, then open a debtab consultation ( in views ), go to protocol->irc tree, and search for one which have the debtab interface::commandline or interface::text-mode.
> 
> 
> >
> 
> > Aptitude with debtags is my favorite method to search for softwares which would fit my needs: it can filter stuff by many things, like programming language, interface (x11, ncurses...), library (gtk, qt), desktop environment... very useful when you try to keep a system as lightweight as possible (I avoid stuff related to DE, and try to avoid any thing with many dependencies, like python softwares usually.)
> 
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > -- 
> 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-us...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
> > Archive: [🔎] 5a592a4c477fba01017edb10b27254f7@neutralite.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 5a592a4c477fba01017edb10b27254f7@neutralite.org
> 
> >
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I recommend you install debian with a GUI at first, because things will get messy and hard to do since (no offense here) you have no experience with Linux. Just select a desktop environment when you are prompted for the server selection previously mentioned.
> 
> 
> The reason for that is: if you want to learn Linux commands, you need a terminal emulator. That can be a Gnome-Terminal, Konsole (if you chose KDE), xterm or tens more. In the mean time, you will find it more confortable to learn from a GUI.
> 
> 
> Tip: for console browsers, you can try "apt-get install links" or lynx. They are so great, both of them.
> 
> You might want to try an introductory guide to Linux to get you started using it. I have.. many times :-)
> 
> Good luck and exercise your google-fu!

thx, I decide to install text-based system first and then just install KDE by apt-get. BTW, I find that debian-handbook.info is nice resource for people to learn or configure Debian.


Reply to: