Re: dhclient "No DHCPOFFERS received"
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:16:45PM +0100, Klaus wrote:
> On 07/08/13 18:24, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> >In article <[🔎] 20130807164822.GA7727@tuzo>,
> > Sean Alexandre<sean@alexan.org> wrote:
> >>No, unfortunately. I know it's not a MAC address issue. Both my TP-LINK home
> >>router and the Debian Wheezy machine that works get DHCP leases without any
> >>problems, and have different MAC addresses.
> >>
> >>I also asked my ISP about this, when I had them on the line to bring up my
> >>new cable modem. They said any MAC address is fine. Just power the cable
> >>modem down for 30 seconds first.
> >
> >Ok, I did say I was kind of stating the obvious!
> >
> >Next thing I'd be doing is using tshark or similar to sniff the traffic
> >being seen on the Debian box.
> >
> >Andy
> >
> >
> Just more of the obvious stuff:
> You say it's a new cable modem, there is a home router, and there is
> at least one other Debian Wheezy box.
> Does your ISP provide you with one, or more than one IP address? If
> one, the router probably translates this "public" IP address to your
> "private" LAN. Does the router function as a DHCP server, or do you
> have a dedicated box on your LAN? Can you check the logs of your LAN
> DHCP server for entries matching the non-functioning box?
There's no NAT in what I'm doing, no. The boxes in each case get a public
IP address from my ISP (or try to.) The different cases are:
CASE 1, works:
[cable modem]---[TP-LINK router]
CASE 2, works:
[cable modem]---[wheezy box that works]
CASE 3, doesn't work:
[cable modem]---[wheezy box that doesn't work]
I attach a laptop to the TP-LINK router to see that it got an IP address, so
there's NAT there. But, NAT doens't come into play for the larger problem, if
that's what you're asking.
Reply to: