Re: tntnet
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: tntnet
- From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:42:41 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20130801054241.GV4855@rail.eu.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CABF62pneP-uRyo6jXeJ=DL=o9jvagST4GWHRUCQXgSepn+tacQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CABF62pm64d_ktxWpdrY90obLdsXssskvxREHPNQN+UOb0U8PDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAr43iN0E15vj-hDE+knnCQ77osHLqPNoA5g9cO_sq0snxrRgA@mail.gmail.com> <CABF62pk7f8jJavbDB3=6cFGPHB+BgKJBgRCfk4Muh1sU8k0bXg@mail.gmail.com> <20130731145917.GT4855@rail.eu.org> <CABF62pneP-uRyo6jXeJ=DL=o9jvagST4GWHRUCQXgSepn+tacQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:04:59PM CEST, ChadDavis <chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com> said:
> > It means synaptic knows of a newer version of google-chrome-stable,
> > but since you specifically asked for removal of tntnet it won't touch
> > it.
> >
> > Nothing to worry about.
> >
>
> So, there's no connection between chrome and tntnet, it's just
> pointing out that "while I'm doing stuff, there's this other package
> that could be upgraded but I'm not going to . . ." ?
>
That's exactly the point.
Reply to: