Re: Starting Google Chrome - resend
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 01:13:07AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 07 July 2013 00:31:41 Charlie wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 22:36:59 +0100 "Lisi Reisz lisi.reisz@gmail.com"
> > sent this:
> >
> > >On Saturday 06 July 2013 22:24:34 Stephen Allen wrote:
> > >> I have it working here fine on Debian's Chromium.
> > >
> > >Does it matter?
> > >
> > >Lisi
> >
> > I think it must Lisi, because someone posted about a problem with Chrome
> > and the discussion was taken from that to Chromium not being "nearly"
> > the same and then about things not working in Chromium or Chrome and so
> > it continued.
> >
> > So I imagine it does matter.
>
> Yes, Charlie. I agree. I had been involved in the discussion and agree that
> that discussion matters. And most people were saying that they found
> flash-plugin-nonfree adequate, with which I did not disagree. It was not
> adequate for me, it was for them. Worth establishing. And it may well have
> been my fault that I did not find it satisfactory.
>
> <Quote from Stephen>
> What do you mean exactly? It just does, if you have it installed. You
> must go to Adobe's website and install it first of course.
>
> I have it working here fine on Debian's Chromium.
> </quote>
>
> But Stephen appeared to me to want confrontation for confrontation's sake, and
> it was that with which I was disagreeing. Of course I know about having to
> get it and install it before it would work! It appeared to me as if he was
> being deliberately insulting. So I repeat: Does it matter that Stephen,
> clever Stephen, has it working to his satisfaction, so assumes that I am too
> thick to know that something is not going to work unless I first download and
> install it? I still say not!
>
> Lisi
>
---end quoted text---
Sorry, no confrontation and wasn't trolling. Flash is on it's last legs,
and I'm just left wondering what you expect. <shrug> No worries.
--
Cheers,
Stephen, Toronto
My Google+ Profile | http://goo.gl/JbQsq
Reply to: