Darac Marjal wrote at 2013-04-18 04:05 -0500: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:43:27PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Security issues, which affect modules, but not the kernel itself, may not cause > > the need of a new kernel. When people lik me and others on this list, are > > using a very small kernel, with minimalistic modules, and the security issues > > affect modules, which are not built nor installed, then there is no need, to > > install a new kernel. > > Out of curiosity, where is the evidence for this FUD that people are > coming up with that the kernel core CANNOT have a security issue? I think that what Hans wrote above is ambiguous, I assume Hans meant "[Those] security issues which affect modules…"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature