Re: dbus - Was: A thread that shouldn't be mentioned anymore

[Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>]

Le 09/04/2013 19:29, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
> On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 07:21 -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > dbus often is a PITA!
> >   
> > Do you have experience with dbus's predecessors, such as
> > CORBA?
> No. I guess a predecessor won't help, if applications depend on dbus,
> such as jackd/jackdmp. I'm aware that I can use jackdmp without dbus,
> since I'm already doing this and I read that others are able to handle
> this dbus issue even when they run jack with dbus for sessions without
> X, IIUC.
WHen reporting erreor messages when emacs-gtk from a ssh -X session, I 
was told that "it's normal that it won't work since it uses dbus". Since 
then I have a bad feeling with dbus dependencies which seem to reduce 
the capabilities of otherwise perfectly working software.