[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dbus - Was: A thread that shouldn't be mentioned anymore

Le 09/04/2013 19:29, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 07:21 -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
dbus often is a PITA!
Do you have experience with dbus's predecessors, such as
No. I guess a predecessor won't help, if applications depend on dbus,
such as jackd/jackdmp. I'm aware that I can use jackdmp without dbus,
since I'm already doing this and I read that others are able to handle
this dbus issue even when they run jack with dbus for sessions without

WHen reporting erreor messages when emacs-gtk from a ssh -X session, I was told that "it's normal that it won't work since it uses dbus". Since then I have a bad feeling with dbus dependencies which seem to reduce the capabilities of otherwise perfectly working software.

Reply to: