Re: dbus - Was: A thread that shouldn't be mentioned anymore
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 19:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 07:21 -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > dbus often is a PITA!
> >
> > Do you have experience with dbus's predecessors, such as
> > CORBA?
>
> No. I guess a predecessor won't help, if applications depend on dbus,
> such as jackd/jackdmp. I'm aware that I can use jackdmp without dbus,
> since I'm already doing this and I read that others are able to handle
> this dbus issue even when they run jack with dbus for sessions without
> X, IIUC.
Oops, perhaps you mean that they were less good :D. I confused it with
the word "successor" and noticed it after I sent the mail.
Reply to: