[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: syslinux, live-build - looking for files



Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013 schrieb David Sastre Medina:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 07:31:21PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > > > I am looking for the following files for wheezy:
> > > > 
> > > > ldlinux.c32
> > > > libcom32.c32
> > > > libutil.c32
> > > > 
> > > > They should be in package live-build:
> > > > 
> > > > apt-file search ldlinux.c32
> > > > live-build: /usr/share/live/build/bootloaders/extlinux/ldlinux.c32
> > > > live-build: /usr/share/live/build/bootloaders/isolinux/ldlinux.c32
> > > > live-build: /usr/share/live/build/bootloaders/pxelinux/ldlinux.c32
> > > > live-build: /usr/share/live/build/bootloaders/syslinux/ldlinux.c32
> > > > 
> > > > But there are only a symlink to /usr/lib/syslinux/l*.c32
> > > 
> > > All three files can be found in the upstream package¹ (pick the version
> > > you need):
> > > 
> > > $ atool -l syslinux-5.01.zip | grep -E 'l(dlinux|ib(util|com32)).c32'
> > > 
> > >     24812  2013-01-28 17:55   com32/libutil/libutil.c32
> > >    
> > >    115784  2013-01-28 17:55   com32/elflink/ldlinux/ldlinux.c32
> > >    184268  2013-01-28 17:55   com32/lib/libcom32.c32
> > > 
> > > Indeed, it looks like a (syslinux-common?) packaging bug, as the target
> > > for those files can't be found in the package:
> > > 
> > > # apt-file search /usr/lib/syslinux/l*.c32
> > > syslinux-common: /usr/lib/syslinux/linux.c32
> > > 
> > > ¹ https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/
> > 
> > Nope, it is ldinux.c32 and not linux.c32 that I am looking for.
> 
> Precisely, that's what I'm trying to show (maybe not very
> successfully). The sylinux-common package does not contain files
> matching /usr/lib/syslinux/l*.c32 other than linux.c32.

Yes, and it seems , these are not in the syslinux packages from kernel.org.
I found only a single rpm packiage of RedHat (version 5.0), which got it into.

Best regards

Hans


Reply to: