[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sound juicer over-range



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:10:30 +0000
"Russell L. Harris" <rlharris@broadcaster.org> wrote:

> Sound Juicer 2.28.2 in Debian Squeeze (i386) was easy to use, ran
> quickly, and appeared to function properly when ripping tracks of an
> audiobook CD to .flac files.
> 
> But upon subsequent listening to the .flac files, over-ranges about
> once per minute were apparent; I verified these by loading the files
> into Audacity.

Try listening to the CD directly without ripping it. Is it still
happening? If it is, then the problem would be with the CD rather than
the software. Sound Juicer *should* be giving you an exact lossless rip
if you're using it to make FLAC.

> I found neither mail list for Sound Juicer, but only a Gnome web page
> with the Sound Juicer user manual.  The page had one email address for
> the development/support team, but the address now is inactive.
> 
> Any suggestions?  Is there a better ripping application?
> 
> RLH

Personally I've always used cdparanoia (which is for the console) and
the command-line 'flac' utility afterward for ripping CDs, and then
using exfalso for tagging... which is very roundabout and obnoxious,
especially if you have as many discs as are in an audiobook. Sound
Juicer actually uses cdparanoia as its backend, though, so I'm not sure
if it would fix whatever problem you seem to be having.

I use the cdparanoia command-line version because I feel much more
certain that I'll get a perfect rip of the disc, or at least that I'll
be made aware of any potential issues with the rip (all the little !'s
or +'s or V's in the output---see cdparanoia's man-page). From using it
in the past I never felt sound juicer gave me enough information.

- -- 
Aubrey

"There are two types of people in the world: those who
  can extrapolate from incomplete data."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRN8JcAAoJEDqgFXa7UFQOMeQH/2BIeDnIBPp0XtiXlUgelB/2
pFlGd6lY5ppR1VXssZy2ZJsd/18DEg3DmjMlwgj9/5qEwexhvdsmVp5KGtlrW9T4
Gdl93rONo7Ork+AF8k0R9IJ6GSDC1oXyFxZSTOJlBGtOFj2k8YOrVm9JjT4eu/Gt
Vd7R8wscfcU+T4Se05QhdXTJZaiL0byiqQdoYjQPq4Fo+rAckXR1tELAbA9dfGaO
mw3WCg+PhxPwNrF6s2K2hw1FwAzXOIlXO3X0/eI+hzP9KxEI9lCC9iRrM3gqgW01
m3fhhYl3I8L9keidp8UjPfshpcTEPNH4jM0C6MEbnAXfF/bqfBcMqGUkw2g+0CM=
=gJOM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to: