Re: It is not worthwhile reporting a bug on Debian wheezy/sid..
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
03.05.2012 15:42, Csanyi Pal kirjoitti:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid system.
>
> The Gorm.app is a Visual Interface Builder for GNUstep, but has a
> bug.
>
> Now, when I'm trying to report a bug using 'reportbug' tool, I get
> following message:
>
> Your version (1.2.10-2.1) of gorm.app appears to be out of date.
> The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian
> archive: testing: 1.2.10-2.1+b1 unstable: 1.2.10-2.1+b1 Do you
> still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?
>
> So, I can't do nothing because of this estate.
>
> Are there more versions of Debian testing and unstable systems?
>
> Why these Debian archives doesn't have the same packages?
>
Have you tried running "aptitude update" and "aptitude upgrade"?
- --
Mika Suomalainen
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728
Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
I use GPG/INLINE, because some mailing list programs modify the headers
of messages and this way make signature.asc files (PGP/MIME)
unverifiable. Please remove lines about beginning and ending GPG
signature blocks in your replies to messages, which are sent by me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=d32J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: