Re: [OT] Posting styles
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [OT] Posting styles
- From: Indulekha <indulekha@theunworthy.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:07:33 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120411170733.GA11000@radhesyama>
- In-reply-to: <iP8U3-6Gc-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
- References: <iP8AG-6ea-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8AG-6ea-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8AG-6ea-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8AG-6ea-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8AG-6ea-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8AG-6ea-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8AG-6ea-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8AG-6ea-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8AH-6ea-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <iP8U3-6Gc-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
In linux.debian.user, Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But you mentioned mutt in the other post, does slrn use mutt for=20
> posting? Mutt has no trouble reply'ing even to it's own bad messages.
I am reading in slrn, which is configured to use mutt to reply.
Unfortunately, the mailtonews gateway is strictly one way (no nntp
posting to this list is possible).
In any event this "mutt-patched" pkg is not exactly state-of-the-art,
and doesn't even include the nntp patch. :(
Will build my own from source when I have the time to tie up all my
bandwidth for an hour getting the sources...
--
❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Indulekha
Reply to: