Re: [OT] Posting styles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07.04.2012 13:57, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 07/04/12 20:25, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>> On 07.04.2012 12:48, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On 07/04/12 19:28, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>>>> On 07.04.2012 12:11, Wayne Topa wrote:
>>>>> On 04/07/2012 04:16 AM, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>>> <---snip -- >
>>>>>>>
> <snipped>
>>
>> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
>
> Pay particular attention to the last point two points and consider
> how many people endorse your line of reasoning.
>
> <snipped>
>
>> If I understood correctly, it also means that there is no
>> checking is email address spoofed or not.
>
> Spam control using SPF maybe??
>
> ie. not requiring people subscribe has nothing to do with checking
> that messages come from valid mailers.
>
> Unmoderated means no official moderator/s, not that the list isn't
> self-moderating. ;-)
>
> NOTE: I'm not telling you *not* to sign your mails - just your
> justification for doing so is false, and your signature is
> invalid.
>
> If the signature was valid, those of us that do use Engimail
> *wouldn't* see that chunk of text.
>
> Kind regards
>
As far as I know, I have valid signature. That block which was pasted
here is shown as invalid, because the one who first started
complaining about it didn't use Enigmail and/or pasted only the
signature block without message which it belongs to.
- --
Mika Suomalainen
> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
> 4DB53CFE82A46728 Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65
> 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Ao+i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: