[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problems with having two DHCP servers...



On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 15:55 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:40 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:57 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >> A limited amount of redundancy is good.  If one goes down, the  
> >> network
> >> can still limp along.
> >>
> >> Anyway, that's the theory.
> >>
> >> Rick
> >>
> >> On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >>
> >>>> I'm not the OP, but I do have this problem.  When I try to do an
> >>>> install (wheezy) on a network with two DHCP servers, the  
> >>>> installer's
> >>>> dhcp-client never seems to get an IP address -- even though the two
> >>>> servers are both responding and both giving the same IP address.
> >>>
> >>> Then why have 2?
> >>
> >>
> > The problem is when they are administering addresses in the same  
> > range.
> > I've not configured DHCP for a long time so maybe this is common now  
> > and
> > the problems have all been resolved but, in the past, if one wanted
> > redundancy, one would administer different ranges on the same subnet  
> > so
> > that there would be no conflicts.  Hope that helps - John
> 
> Yes, that does seem to fit.
> 
> The two servers have different ranges for their "dynamic" clients  
> (i.e. transient laptops with no fixed IP address) but for the "static"  
> clients (desktops with a fixed IP address) there is only one address,  
> so both servers have to provide the same address.
> 
> So... when I do an install for a machine with an unknown Ethernet Mac  
> address -- hence getting it's IP from one or another of the "dynamic"  
> ranges -- all goes well.  It's only when I attempt to install a  
> machine with a known Mac address (hence a single static IP) that I run  
> into trouble.
> 
> Somehow, I would have thought it should be the other way round --  
> conflicting responses would cause problems, not two responses that  
> both say the same thing.  Sigh!  Just shows how much I know...
> 
> So is there a way to have both redundancy *and* reliable installs?
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> 
> Rick
> 
> PS: As others have noted, it seems to affect only the installer's DHCP  
> client.  After the reboot, there's no problem -- with either static or  
> dynamic IP...
> 
Hmm . . . could you install with a manual IP address and then simply
change the configuration once the installation is done? - John


Reply to: