weirdness mounting phone
Hi,
Can anyone shed any light on this behaviour when plugging in my
Galaxy Y into my wheezy laptop
-------8-< ---------------------------------------------------------
root@tal:~# [1132299.352535] cdc_acm 1-1:1.1: This device cannot do
calls on its own. It is not a modem.
root@tal:~# mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/
mount: special device /dev/sdb1 does not exist
root@tal:~# mount /dev/sdb /mnt/
[1132797.293727] sd 11:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page present
[1132797.297301] sd 11:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[1132797.303096] sd 11:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page present
[1132797.306600] sd 11:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[1132797.405356] FAT-fs (sdb): bogus number of reserved sectors
mount: you must specify the filesystem type
root@tal:~# mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/
root@tal:~# ls -al /mnt/
total 484
drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 16384 Jan 1 1970 .
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 Sep 3 17:44 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 4 19:21 .adobe-digital-editions
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 32768 Sep 27 01:21 Android
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 4 19:41 .android_secure
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Sep 27 02:26 bluetooth
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 2 19:30 burstlyImageCache
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 32768 Sep 27 12:52 DCIM
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 4 19:21 Digital Editions
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 3 15:53 download
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 2 20:13 .downloadTemp
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 32768 Oct 13 22:23 eBooks
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Sep 27 01:21 LOST.DIR
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 4 19:10 samsungapps
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 2 18:16 .slotmachine_files_9_2
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Oct 15 06:11 Sounds
root@tal:~#
-------8-< ---------------------------------------------------------
Not sure how a desktop (Gnome, KDE, LXDE etc.) would handle this.
Not a problem, just weird.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: