[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Nvidia upgrade 304.48.1 in sid



Charles Kroeger,

Hi. See my message "What is the procedure for patching the Debian
kernel ?". I had a similar problem with the nvidia driver. I need to
rebuild the nvidia DKMS driver manually after some package updates for
my custom kernel. This has worked before with no problem. But on a
recent update I can no longer build nvidia DKMS for my custom kernel
(the vanilla kernel is fine). Not sure why this is but maybe the error
messages I quote can help in some way.

Barney Holmes

On 29 September 2012 18:15, Charles Kroeger
<ckrogrr@frankensteinface.com> wrote:
> Has anyone else done this upgrade and found it breaks an X session?
> I had to install the xserver-xorg-video-vesa server to take the place of the nvidia
> driver.
>
> My nvidia stuff:
>
> ii  glx-alternative-nvidia                 0.2.2 amd64
> ii libgl1-nvidia-alternatives             304.48-2 amd64
> ii libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64                304.48-2 amd64
> ii libglx-nvidia-alternatives             304.48-2 amd64
> ii nvidia-alternative                     304.48-2 amd64
> ii nvidia-glx                             304.48-2 amd64
> ii nvidia-installer-cleanup         20120630+3 amd64
> ii  nvidia-kernel-common        20120630+3 amd64
> ii  nvidia-kernel-dkms              304.48-2 amd64
> ii nvidia-kernel-source             304.48-2 amd64
> ii nvidia-libopencl1:amd64       304.48-2 amd64
> ii nvidia-settings                       304.48-1 amd64
> ii  nvidia-support                      20120630+3 amd64
> ii  nvidia-vdpau-driver:amd64   304.48-2 amd64
> ii  xserver-xorg-video-nvidia     304.48-2 amd64
>
> missing something?
>
> --
> CK
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] acoolgFgspmU1@mid.individual.net">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] acoolgFgspmU1@mid.individual.net
>



-- 
         ~~~
http://djbarney.org
         ~~~


Reply to: