Re: Installation
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:41:46 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Why would it have to be taken over by a company? That wouldn't remove
>>> the need for learning.
>>
>> Because companies have the necessary resources to provide the kind of
>> support a newbie requires (e.g., IBM, HP, RedHat, Canonical or SUSE are
>> good examples for this). No user-driven mailing list can help these
>> kind of newbies in the same way that a company does, if someone told
>> you so it wasn't being sincere.
>
> The only way in which Suse has been helping me is by including
> documentation in form of a book with their distributions --- which after
> not very long didn't answer the questions I had anymore.
(...)
> Companies may have resources they could use to provide support. Simply
> having them doesn't mean that they do.
They do provide support as long as you pay for it, of course. Laziness
has a price.
>>>> Because Windows OEM installations are always -regardless the version-
>>>> quick and take little time but we are not talking here about this,
>>>> you know...
>>>
>>> No, they aren't.
>>
>> By your replies I can deduce that either:
>>
>> a) You have never installed a OEMized version of Windows or, b) You are
>> not very skilled user because these versions provide a wizard that only
>> asks you no more than 5 basic questions, or c) You're simply joking...
>
> None of your deductions is correct
(...)
Then kindly tell me why you seem to ignore a fact that everybody is aware
of.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: